Author summary
30% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Taylor results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 960 hits . Analysis detected 7,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,087 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,171 of 6,629 authors). This Kate Taylor is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Kate Taylor
Author details
Total words: 8,087
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst