Author summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leah Feiger results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,713 of 6,629 authors). This Leah Feiger is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Leah Feiger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠60%Leah Feiger (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 12.8%12.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 12.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos