Speaker summary
51% 6 analyzed articles/videos 460.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rich Paul results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 124.246 hits . Analysis detected 573.99 faulty-reasoning hits from 460.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,673 of 28,364 speakers). This Rich Paul is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Rich Paul
Speaker details
Total words: 460.667
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 7.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos460.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst