Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriela Carroll results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 1,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,295 of 6,628 authors). This Gabriela Carroll is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Gabriela Carroll
Author details
Total words: 2,908
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst