Author summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Kawakami results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 606 hits . Analysis detected 4,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,249 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,602 of 6,484 authors). This Tim Kawakami is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Tim Kawakami
Author details
Total words: 5,249
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.6% 11.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst