Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ira Winderman results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 195 hits . Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,746 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,306 of 6,226 authors). This Ira Winderman is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Ira Winderman
Author details
Total words: 1,746
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst