Speaker summary
⁠81%4 analyzed articles/videos70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reuters Institute results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 80% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,289 of 28,364 speakers). This Reuters Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Reuters Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 70
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
66.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos70 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 80.0%80.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 80.0%80.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.0%40.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos