Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Freeman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,105 hits. Analysis detected 5,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,617 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,375 of 6,464 authors). This Brian Freeman is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Brian Freeman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
48%Brian Freeman (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,617
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.7%16.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate