Speaker summary
43% 81 analyzed articles/videos 1,337.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 268.234 hits . Analysis detected 2,398.2 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,337.333 analyzed words across 81 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,030 of 28,364 speakers). This Police is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Police
Speaker details
Total words: 1,337.333
Content count: 81
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score81 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst