NBC News⁠99%

Two men stabbed near Central Park ⁠94%

7/23/2026, 5:38:35 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 575 faulty-reasoning hits from 224 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 90.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,324 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the video peer group.

andĀ IĀ wouldĀ haveĀ gottenĀ stabbed.Ā 
>>Ā Tonight,Ā aĀ terrifyingĀ doubleĀ stabbingĀ onĀ NewĀ YorkĀ City'sĀ UpperĀ WestĀ Side.Ā 
AccordingĀ toĀ lawĀ enforcementĀ sources,Ā itĀ happenedĀ aroundĀ 1:30Ā p.m.Ā nearĀ CentralĀ Park,Ā justĀ feetĀ fromĀ aĀ synagogue.Ā 
WitnessesĀ sayĀ theĀ manĀ yelledĀ "AllahuĀ Akbar"Ā andĀ stabbedĀ aĀ 57-year-oldĀ AsianĀ manĀ inĀ theĀ backĀ withoutĀ warning.Ā 
TheĀ suspectĀ thenĀ walkedĀ twoĀ blocks,Ā accordingĀ toĀ lawĀ enforcementĀ sources,Ā andĀ minutesĀ laterĀ stabbedĀ aĀ 50-year-oldĀ JewishĀ manĀ inĀ theĀ chest.Ā 
InĀ thisĀ videoĀ shotĀ byĀ anĀ eyewitness,Ā youĀ seeĀ himĀ grippingĀ hisĀ chest.Ā 
TheĀ attackerĀ escapedĀ intoĀ aĀ nearbyĀ building,Ā butĀ wasĀ takenĀ intoĀ custodyĀ anĀ hourĀ later.Ā 
>>Ā I'mĀ shocked.Ā 
IĀ wouldn'tĀ haveĀ thoughtĀ IĀ thoughtĀ thisĀ wasĀ aĀ aĀ movieĀ scene,Ā youĀ know?Ā 
IĀ thoughtĀ thisĀ wasĀ completelyĀ staged.Ā 
So,Ā I'mĀ I'mĀ inĀ shock.Ā 
IĀ wouldĀ haveĀ neverĀ thoughtĀ thatĀ thisĀ wouldĀ happenĀ inĀ inĀ thisĀ neighborhood,Ā whichĀ isĀ veryĀ quiet,Ā calm,Ā fullĀ ofĀ families,Ā andĀ uhĀ >>Ā Yeah.Ā >>Ā nothingĀ intenseĀ happeningĀ here.Ā 
>>Ā VideoĀ shotĀ byĀ aĀ personĀ standingĀ nearbyĀ showsĀ firstĀ respondersĀ onĀ scene.Ā 
>>Ā CertainlyĀ unnervingĀ andĀ whenĀ it'sĀ random,Ā you'reĀ like,Ā "Geez,Ā thatĀ canĀ kindĀ ofĀ happenĀ toĀ anyone."Ā 
UmĀ yeah,Ā scary.Ā 
>>Ā TheĀ motiveĀ unclear.Ā 
PoliceĀ areĀ investigatingĀ ifĀ thisĀ wasĀ aĀ hateĀ crime.Ā 
TheyĀ sayĀ theyĀ believeĀ mentalĀ healthĀ wasĀ aĀ factor.Ā 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%NBC News: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 20.5%NBC News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias20.5%This article: 37.5%NBC News: 2.9%Availability Heuristic37.5%This article: 11.2%NBC News: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic11.2%This article: 9.4%NBC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias9.4%This article: 4.0%NBC News: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 20.5%NBC News: 6.4%Framing Effect20.5%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.5%NBC News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%NBC News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias8.9%This article: 18.8%NBC News: 7.0%Negativity Bias18.8%This article: 2.7%NBC News: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 4.0%NBC News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 31.7%NBC News: 3.2%Appeal to Authority31.7%This article: 4.0%NBC News: 1.2%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.4%NBC News: 3.2%Hasty Generalization9.4%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.8%NBC News: 0.7%Bandwagon1.8%This article: 12.9%NBC News: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion12.9%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.8%NBC News: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.8%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.0%NBC News: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.7%NBC News: 0.1%Composition/Division2.7%This article: 17.4%NBC News: 1.5%Anecdotal17.4%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.7%NBC News: 0.1%Middle Ground6.7%This article: 6.3%NBC News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity6.3%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 4.0%NBC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy4.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

224 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.