Speaker summary
53% 13 analyzed articles/videos 713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Bondi results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 1,957.606 faulty-reasoning hits from 713 analyzed words across 13 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (24,991 of 26,348 speakers). This Pam Bondi is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Pam Bondi
Speaker details
Total words: 713
Content count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score13 analyzed videos713 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst