Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashraf Khalil results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 625 hits. Analysis detected 3,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,058 of 6,218 authors). This Ashraf Khalil is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Ashraf Khalil
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%Ashraf Khalil (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,316
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos