Speaker summary
49% 14 analyzed articles/videos 809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mauricio Pochettino results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 139 hits . Analysis detected 1,376.79 faulty-reasoning hits from 809 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,740 of 28,364 speakers). This Mauricio Pochettino is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Mauricio Pochettino
Speaker details
Total words: 809
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 4.7% BS Score14 analyzed videos809 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst