Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Deitsch results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 3,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,517 of 6,628 authors). This Richard Deitsch is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Richard Deitsch
Author details
Total words: 4,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst