Speaker summary
â 55% 14 analyzed articles/videos 1,014.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Zuckerberg results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 183.907 hits . Analysis detected 1,694.339 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,014.667 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of â 4% (25,862 of 26,736 speakers). This Mark Zuckerberg is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker details
Total words: 1,014.667
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.6% BS Score14 analyzed videos1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst