Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Aditi Bharade results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 398 hits . Analysis detected 2,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,361 authors). This Aditi Bharade is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Aditi Bharade
Author details
Total words: 6,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst