Engadget39%

Meta Is Reportedly Considering A Multibillion-Dollar Data Center Deal With Anthropic 39%

By Karissa Bell20%

7/17/2026, 8:51:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 575 faulty-reasoning hits from 285 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (12,524 of 20,447 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the article peer group.

Meta is "in talks" with Anthropic to lease some of its data centers, according to a new report in *The New York Times*. 
The discussions are still in early stages, the report says, but could end in a deal worth up to $10 billion over two years. 
The report follows earlier reporting from *Bloomberg* that the social media company was eyeing an entry into the cloud services business. 
Providing compute resources to other companies would be an entirely new business for Meta, which makes the vast majority of its revenue from advertising. 
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has previously hinted at the possibility of selling its data center space. 
During an earnings call last year, he said that the company fields such requests "almost every week" and that he considered it "an option" for the future. 
While Meta and Anthropic are ostensibly rivals on the AI front, such an arrangement could benefit both companies. 
Meta has been making massive investments in AI data centers to fuel its own ambitions to build leading AI models. 
That level of expenditure has also raised some eyebrows as Meta has said it expects to spend between $125 billion and $145 billion in 2026 alone. 
But leasing its data centers to a company like Anthropic, which has a seemingly endless need for compute resources, would turn some of those data center investments into a new, multibillion-dollar business. 
Anthropic previously inked a similar deal with SpaceXAI ahead of the Elon Musk-led company's initial public offering earlier this summer. 
That deal is reportedly worth $45 billion over three years. 
The Claude Code maker immediately raised subscribers' rate limits after announcing the arrangement. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Karissa Bell: 3.2%Engadget: 3.0%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 21.1%Karissa Bell: 0.9%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias21.1%This article: 11.9%Karissa Bell: 3.6%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 8.4%Karissa Bell: 1.4%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic8.4%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.2%Engadget: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 2.1%Engadget: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 3.1%Engadget: 5.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 26.7%Karissa Bell: 2.5%Engadget: 4.5%Optimism Bias26.7%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.9%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Karissa Bell: 6.8%Engadget: 7.0%Negativity Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.5%Engadget: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 1.4%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.4%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.2%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Karissa Bell: 0.4%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.6%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Karissa Bell: 1.9%Engadget: 1.7%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 5.6%Karissa Bell: 0.4%Engadget: 0.5%Primacy Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.2%Engadget: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.7%Karissa Bell: 3.9%Engadget: 5.0%Appeal to Authority13.7%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.1%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.6%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.1%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.5%Karissa Bell: 6.2%Engadget: 5.1%Hasty Generalization10.5%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.1%Engadget: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 2.1%Engadget: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.3%Karissa Bell: 1.6%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question6.3%This article: 22.8%Karissa Bell: 2.8%Engadget: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.8%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.2%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 2.3%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.4%Karissa Bell: 0.8%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division8.4%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 6.0%Engadget: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Karissa Bell: 2.9%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.2%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.2%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.5%Karissa Bell: 3.9%Engadget: 2.8%Unattributed Quote9.5%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 1.8%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.7%Karissa Bell: 4.1%Engadget: 7.4%Biased Writer Voice13.7%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.1%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karissa Bell: 0.7%Engadget: 3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

285 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech242writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMark Zuckerberg • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMark Zuckerberg • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mark Zuckerberg

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words100% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+62.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mark Zuckerberg: 62.8%62.8%Biased Writer Voice-16.1 ptsWriter: 16.1%Mark Zuckerberg: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.