Topic summary
69% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meta results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 3,915 hits . Analysis detected 25,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,766 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,126 of 15,755 topics). This Meta is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Meta
Topic details
Total words: 24,766
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles24.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst