Is rare bacteria in Wyoming city's water linked to Meta data center? What we know 44%

By Jack Izzo8%

7/17/2026, 4:00:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 962 faulty-reasoning hits from 663 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,388 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the article peer group.

In July 2026, a claim circulated online that the city of Cheyenne, Wyoming, had identified a rare, drug-resistant bacteria in the city's water. 
The source of the bacteria, according to the posts, was a massive nearby data center owned by Meta, the technology giant that operates Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. 
Snopes readers searched the site looking for more information about the rumor. 
Based on reporting in local news outlets, the claim appears to consist of a mixture of true and exaggerated information. 
Crucially, Snopes could not independently verify the most significant detail  that the city had traced the bacteria to Meta's data center  and therefore cannot give the rumor a simple true or false rating. 
Here's what's we know ... 
According to a Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities news release on June 26, 2026, laboratory staff identified a bacteria named Cupriavidus gilardii in the city's wastewater in February. 
(It's important to note at this point that the bacteria was not reported to have entered the city's drinking water supply). 
The board's staff traced the bacteria's source to "an industrial user within the system," though they did not name what the source was. 
They did announce that the source was "immediately and permanently" barred from discharging into the city's wastewater. 
Snopes contacted representatives from the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities, Meta, and Fortis Construction, Meta's contractor on the data center. 
We heard back from Meta, whose response will be detailed below, and the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities, which declined to comment, as of this writing, but said it would release a detailed statement by July 19. 
This story will be updated with new information as we learn more. 
Cupriavidus gilardii 
Though the social media posts were correct in describing C. gilardii as a rare bacteria, the description of "drug-resistant" requires more scrutiny. 
Those words imply that the bacteria can be hard to treat with antibiotics, presenting an increased level of danger to the general public. 
Reviewing medical journals for records of C. gilardii revealed that while the bacteria does have some drug resistance, infections are very rare and generally opportunistic  that is, they occur in people with weak immune systems, including children, the elderly and people recovering from surgeries. 
The infection can be fatal. 
The city of Cheyenne treats some of its wastewater and uses it to irrigate parks, golf courses and other green spaces, according to the Laramie Boomerang, a local Wyoming newspaper. 
The board was concerned that using the contaminated wastewater in sprinklers would aerosolize the bacteria and increase the risk of infections. 
According to the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities' news release, C. gilardii is a naturally occurring bacteria and is "commonly found in soil and groundwater environments." 
This may have made it hard for the board to determine where the bacteria originated from. 
The data center 
Meta first announced the 715,000-square-foot facility in 2024, estimating it would invest more than $800 million in the area. 
The tech company delegated building the facility to a contractor, Fortis Construction. 
According to the local news reports, the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities ultimately traced the bacteria to the site of the data center, and sent its notice of noncompliance to a third company, Goat Systems LLC. 
The news reports say Goat Systems is a shell company Meta set up to manage the project. 
Snopes was unable to independently verify any of those details. 
Meanwhile, Francis Brennan, speaking on behalf of Meta, said via phone call and email that the board sent its notice about the bacteria to Fortis Construction. 
In response, the company stopped flushing wastewater into the system and hired an independent investigator to test for the bacteria. 
Meta said no evidence of the bacteria was found despite repeated tests. 
Brennan also noted that the board had not provided Meta, or the public, any evidence that the bacteria came from the data center. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.3%Jack Izzo: 3.1%Snopes: 2.4%Confirmation Bias3.3%This article: 1.8%Jack Izzo: 1.5%Snopes: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.8%This article: 19.8%Jack Izzo: 4.7%Snopes: 3.4%Availability Heuristic19.8%This article: 6.6%Jack Izzo: 0.9%Snopes: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic6.6%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Jack Izzo: 0.8%Snopes: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias5.3%This article: 5.0%Jack Izzo: 2.1%Snopes: 2.4%Framing Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.1%Snopes: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.3%Snopes: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Jack Izzo: 0.5%Snopes: 0.5%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 3.2%Jack Izzo: 0.5%Snopes: 0.4%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 7.2%Jack Izzo: 5.4%Snopes: 5.1%Negativity Bias7.2%This article: 4.8%Jack Izzo: 0.6%Snopes: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias4.8%This article: 3.5%Jack Izzo: 0.5%Snopes: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.3%Snopes: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.4%Snopes: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.1%Snopes: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Jack Izzo: 0.9%Snopes: 1.5%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 2.9%Jack Izzo: 0.9%Snopes: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.2%Snopes: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.7%Snopes: 1.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.1%Snopes: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.2%Jack Izzo: 6.7%Snopes: 6.0%Appeal to Authority28.2%This article: 7.1%Jack Izzo: 1.0%Snopes: 0.9%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.1%Snopes: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.1%Snopes: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.4%Jack Izzo: 2.8%Snopes: 3.5%Hasty Generalization5.4%This article: 4.1%Jack Izzo: 0.7%Snopes: 0.7%Red Herring4.1%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.6%Snopes: 1.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.2%Jack Izzo: 2.7%Snopes: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion4.2%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.2%Jack Izzo: 2.6%Snopes: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.0%Jack Izzo: 2.7%Snopes: 1.6%Burden of Proof5.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.5%Jack Izzo: 1.8%Snopes: 1.8%Anecdotal3.5%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.0%Jack Izzo: 1.0%Snopes: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.3%Snopes: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.2%Snopes: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.1%Snopes: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Jack Izzo: 6.6%Snopes: 3.3%Unattributed Quote3.9%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 2.2%Snopes: 2.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.2%Jack Izzo: 2.4%Snopes: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice1.2%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.2%Snopes: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.0%Snopes: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jack Izzo: 0.2%Snopes: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

663 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers42%attributed speech386writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSnopes • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageCheyenne Board of Public Utilities • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCheyenne Board of Public Utilities • 23 words • 0.0% coverageCheyenne Board of Public Utilities • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSnopes • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLaramie Boomerang • 30 words • 0.0% coverageCheyenne Board of Public Utilities • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCheyenne Board of Public Utilities • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMeta • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageFrancis Brennan • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMeta • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMeta • 12 words • 0.0% coverageFrancis Brennan • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Francis Brennan

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words18% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+53.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Francis Brennan: 53.1%53.1%Biased Writer Voice-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Francis Brennan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.