Topic summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyoming results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 2,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,773 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,447 of 16,562 topics). This Wyoming is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Wyoming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,773
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos