Author summary
20% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karissa Bell results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 688 hits . Analysis detected 7,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,187 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,800 of 6,170 authors). This Karissa Bell is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Karissa Bell
Author details
Total words: 10,187
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst