Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Reich results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 3,964 hits . Analysis detected 29,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,134 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,895 of 6,508 authors). This Robert Reich is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Robert Reich
Author details
Total words: 16,134
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.6% 24.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.1% 16.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.0% 15.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst