The Guardian81%
Dear Kristi Noem: you’re tracking down ICE critics? I’m one of them89%
By Robert Reich0%
2/19/2026, 5:00:12 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 857 faulty-reasoning hits from 704 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,431 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the article peer group.
The homeland security department is reportedly seeking information on critical social media accounts.
Look no further
The New York Times reports that the Department of Homeland Security has sent Google, Meta (owner of Facebook and Instagram) and other media corporations subpoenas for the names on accounts that criticize ICE enforcement.
The department wants to identify Americans who oppose what it’s doing.
I’ll save them time.
Hello?
Kristi Noem?
Robert Reich here.
I hear you’re trying to find the names of people who are making negative comments on social media about ICE enforcement.
Look no further.
I’ve done it frequently.
I’m still doing it.
This note to you is another example.
If you want more details, just type “Robert Reich” into an internet browser, followed by YouTube or Facebook or Instagram or X or TikTok or Reddit or Substack or the Guardian.
Then type in your name, or ICE, or the Department of Homeland Security.
That will give you plenty of evidence.
If you read what I’ve said, you’ll find it’s very critical.
I’ve done some videos that are very critical of you and ICE, too.
Let me not mince words: I really, truly believe you’re doing a shitty job.
I’ve said and will continue to say that many of the things you and the administration are doing are unconstitutional.
For example: arresting people without giving them due process of law to defend themselves.
Putting innocent people into detention camps.
Not giving them adequate food or medical care.
Not letting their families know where they are.
Sending them out of the country to brutal prisons in other lands.
Even jailing children.
Arresting journalists reporting on protests against you.
And killing two innocent Americans and hindering investigations of those killings.
All this is forbidden by the constitution of the United States, Madam Secretary.
The federal courts keep telling you this, but you and your department have repeatedly defied the courts.
This is unconstitutional, too.
You’re even violating the constitution by sending administrative subpoenas to Google, Meta and all the rest, seeking accounts like mine that criticize what you’re doing.
I have a right under the first amendment to criticize you without fear of the consequences.
It’s my government, Madam Secretary.
You see the possessive pronoun I’m using?
My government.
It’s also your government because you’re a citizen of the United States, not because you’re a government official.
You and your boss are supposed to be working for me and every other American.
You swore an oath.
The people of the United States hired the two of you to do your jobs, which doesn’t include spying on us or jailing us or trying to intimidate us or murdering us.
I was once a cabinet officer like you are, Madam Secretary.
I had a big office like you do.
I had a big staff, like you do.
Taxpayers paid for all of it, as they do for everything you’re up to – except when Congress stops the funding, as they have now, because you’re doing so many despicable things.
When I was in the cabinet, Madam Secretary, I was acutely aware of my responsibilities to the constitution of the United States.
I told myself every day that I had sworn an oath to uphold it.
I worked very hard every day to fulfill that responsibility.
I’m not boasting or bragging.
I merely did my duty.
I visited communities where my department’s inspectors were attempting to keep people safe, to make sure they were doing what they were supposed to be doing.
I did what federal judges told me to do.
I invited criticism of me and my department.
That was an important way to get feedback on what we were doing, to learn if we were making mistakes, to improve the way we served the public.
Feedback is very useful in a democracy.
You might even say it’s essential to democracy.
What the hell are you doing, Madam Secretary?
Robert Reich
Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley.
He is a Guardian US columnist and his newsletter is at robertreich.substack.com.
His new book, Coming Up Short: A Memoir of My America, is out now
Speakers
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.