Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristi Noem results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 3,374 hits. Analysis detected 19,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,616 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,475 of 15,387 topics). This Kristi Noem is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Kristi Noem
Topic details
Total words: 14,616
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.1%23.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.0%0.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos