Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Greene results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 1,842 hits . Analysis detected 7,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,440 of 6,628 authors). This Susan Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Susan Greene
Author details
Total words: 6,120
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.1% 30.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst