Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C.J. Ciaramella results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 5,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,472 of 6,379 authors). This C.J. Ciaramella is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. C.J. Ciaramella
Author details
Total words: 4,568
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.4% 7.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.0% 16.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst