Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C.J. Ciaramella results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 5,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,472 of 6,379 authors). This C.J. Ciaramella is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
C.J. Ciaramella
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
77%C.J. Ciaramella (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,568
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.4%7.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos