Topic summary
54% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Google results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,464 hits . Analysis detected 15,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,700 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,800 of 15,634 topics). This Google is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Google
Topic details
Total words: 14,700
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst