Author summary
61% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Cole results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,623 hits . Analysis detected 19,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,279 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,906 of 6,628 authors). This Samantha Cole is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Samantha Cole
Author details
Total words: 16,279
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst