Porn Platform Gives Sex Workers Stake in the Company's Profits 41%

By Samantha Cole61%

7/8/2026, 8:51:42 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,090 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,974 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the article peer group.

The co-founder of adult creator subscription platform MintStars announced she’s leaving the platform and donating her ownership shares in the company to its creators and sex workers. 
In an email to creators using the platform in late June, Jessica Van Meir wrote: "I am donating my shares in the company to create a 20 percent co-ownership pool for our creators." 
She wrote that her remaining three percent of the shares will be donated to SWOP Behind Bars, a non-profit that supports incarcerated sex workers and sex trafficking survivors in the U.S. 
“With this step, which completes my personal mission to launch a company for and by adult content creators, I will also be officially moving on from my position as a Director at MintStars,” Van Meir wrote in the email. 
Van Meir is a Harvard PhD candidate studying the sex workers’ rights movement in Latin America, and also co-founded the Boston Sex Workers and Allies Collective three years ago. 
Van Meir and Daniel Sargent co-founded MintStars in 2021; Sargent will remain at the company as CEO. 
Setting up a share pool sets a precedent rarely seen on subscription sites, where creators are directly rewarded for the success of the platform, not just their own individual work. 
Van Meir said attacks on her academic work outside of MintStars contributed to her decision to step away. 
“In the past year, my PhD research has faced attacks from anti-sex work organizations that have attempted to use my affiliation with MintStars to undermine the credibility of my research,” Van Meir wrote in the letter to creators. 
“I would never want my work with the company to prevent my research and activism from benefiting sex worker communities, so it is time for me to pass the baton.” 
The pool of shares for creators will be allocated “in proportion to their contributions to the platform,” Van Meir wrote, adding that the platform plans to launch a points system to earn ownership. 
If the company is ever sold or pays out dividends to shareholders, creators will be paid in proportion to those points via phantom shares. 
Phantom shares or stock are a cash incentive tied to company performance that doesn’t dilute the company’s ownership stock or give holders voting rights, but do reward holders  typically executives or employees, but in this case, creators  for their contributions to the company’s success. 
According to Van Meir, MintStars creators will be able to earn points in accordance to their earned revenue, how many referrals they’ve made, and number of months they’ve actively used the platform. 
“This means that you will share in the profits of the company’s success, in a fair proportion to how much you’ve contributed,” she wrote. 
Podcast: Why AI Porn Sucks (with Noelle Perdue) 
Noelle and Sam discuss everything from sexbots and AI porn to censorship, age verification legislation, and their favorite parody porn flicks. 
Many social media and user-generated content platforms have grown massive on the strength and support of sex workers who popularized it. 
Some of the biggest, like X and Instagram, grew thanks to sexual content; others, like OnlyFans, have been criticized for considering banning adult content due to payment processing problems and banking discrimination in the past. 
Demonia , a financial dominatrix who’s used MintStars since 2023, told 404 Media she’s felt frustrated by unstable creator platforms and online censorship in the past, and hopes to put more effort into her MintStars presence following this announcement. 
“I will be honest, I didn't think I'd live to see such a revolutionary choice in a strictly capitalistic society and environment that promotes individualism to embarrassing levels, and I am elated to have chosen to be part of this project from its early steps,” Demonia told me in an email. 
“Not only cooperative enterprises are healthier environments to work in on a general level, but there is now a further level of security for the creators who decide to invest in the platform as a source of income, and a great deal of motivation to see it succeed.” 
AVN reported that the program for earning points will launch this month and take retroactive activity into account, and that MintStars will also introduce new governance measures including a Creator Advisory Board. 
“This co-ownership means to me that MintStars aims to empower sex workers on a practical level, recognizing their importance and their rights, without limiting our creativity and safety in the name of profit, and it will definitely impact my effort into making sure such an example lives to make the adult industry's history, not only because it's a better choice for myself only, but because it also shows to everyone that there is a better way to enjoy our kinky spaces without being afraid of being deplatformed, of our content being rejected or deleted, of our entire existence being put into discussion,” Demonia said. 
“This partnership is another important step forward in creating a complete ecosystem of care that is both for and by adult industry workers,” a spokesperson for SWOP Behind Bars told 404 Media. 
“We're excited to deepen our ties in the MintStars community and anticipate that Ms. 
Van Meir's shares donation will enable us to better understand and meet those workers' needs.” 
MintStars uses the U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin USDC to process payments. 
Fans and customers can pay as they would on any other website, with a credit card. 
Creators can receive payouts in fiat as well. 
Last month, MintStars announced a new partnership with Payy Network. 
"Creators face financial discrimination every day, bank accounts shut down, payment processors blocking transactions, and earnings delayed for weeks," Sargent said in an announcement of that partnership. 
"Crypto solved access, but it didn't solve privacy or safety. 
Nobody's financial activity should be publicly exposed on a blockchain." 
Settlements on the blockchain also prevent some of the most risky aspects of accepting payments as an adult site, including chargebacks, censorship, and banking discrimination. 
“The fact of the matter in the adult industry is that without the working women who make platforms all of their revenue, the latter would never succeed and we can now choose for what we believe in and choose who believes in us, MintStars has given us the opportunity to have our voices heard,” Demonia said. 
“I do hope more sex workers will put their safety and rights first and focus their energies where they will be undoubtedly rewarded, as it's been proven over and over again since the beginning of this project. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.8%Samantha Cole: 3.0%404 Media: 3.5%Confirmation Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.6%404 Media: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Samantha Cole: 4.4%404 Media: 3.8%Availability Heuristic1.9%This article: 2.8%Samantha Cole: 1.5%404 Media: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.7%404 Media: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Samantha Cole: 1.2%404 Media: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias1.9%This article: 6.6%Samantha Cole: 4.6%404 Media: 5.6%Framing Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.3%404 Media: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 1.4%404 Media: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.5%404 Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 27.1%Samantha Cole: 5.3%404 Media: 2.8%Optimism Bias27.1%This article: 4.5%Samantha Cole: 2.5%404 Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 9.9%Samantha Cole: 16.1%404 Media: 11.5%Negativity Bias9.9%This article: 2.2%Samantha Cole: 1.0%404 Media: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 1.1%404 Media: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Samantha Cole: 3.1%404 Media: 0.8%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 1.0%404 Media: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Samantha Cole: 1.1%404 Media: 1.0%Halo Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.9%404 Media: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.0%404 Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Samantha Cole: 1.7%404 Media: 1.0%Recency Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.7%404 Media: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.1%404 Media: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.6%404 Media: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.4%404 Media: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.0%Samantha Cole: 3.5%404 Media: 3.3%Appeal to Authority9.0%This article: 3.1%Samantha Cole: 1.5%404 Media: 1.3%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 2.0%404 Media: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.2%404 Media: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.6%Samantha Cole: 11.4%404 Media: 7.8%Hasty Generalization14.6%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.0%404 Media: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.6%404 Media: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.9%Samantha Cole: 10.3%404 Media: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion20.9%This article: 6.1%Samantha Cole: 0.7%404 Media: 0.7%Begging the Question6.1%This article: 12.3%Samantha Cole: 1.8%404 Media: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.7%404 Media: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.2%404 Media: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.4%Samantha Cole: 0.5%404 Media: 0.4%Appeal to Nature4.4%This article: 5.1%Samantha Cole: 0.3%404 Media: 0.2%Composition/Division5.1%This article: 15.9%Samantha Cole: 3.8%404 Media: 2.9%Anecdotal15.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.3%404 Media: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Samantha Cole: 2.5%404 Media: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.0%404 Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.1%404 Media: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Samantha Cole: 2.1%404 Media: 2.6%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 6.0%Samantha Cole: 2.1%404 Media: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection6.0%This article: 0.9%Samantha Cole: 14.8%404 Media: 11.5%Biased Writer Voice0.9%This article: 15.7%Samantha Cole: 3.3%404 Media: 1.5%Indoctrination15.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.6%404 Media: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 0.1%404 Media: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Cole: 1.2%404 Media: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1090 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers59%attributed speech452writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Van Meir • 33 words • 100.0% coverageJessica Van Meir • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Van Meir • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Van Meir • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Van Meir • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Van Meir • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDemonia • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDemonia • 51 words • 0.0% coverageDemonia • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageDemonia • 104 words • 100.0% coverageSWOP Behind Bars • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSWOP Behind Bars • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSWOP Behind Bars • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sargent • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sargent • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sargent • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDemonia • 56 words • 0.0% coverageDemonia • 37 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Demonia

100%flagged-word coverage
335 attributed words53% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Indoctrination+42.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Demonia: 42.1%42.1%Unattributed Quote-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%Demonia: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Demonia: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Demonia: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.