Keyword summary
78% 15 analyzed articles/videos 9,898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Zuckerberg results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 4,915 hits . Analysis detected 58,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,063 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (22,331 of 34,832 keywords). This Mark Zuckerberg is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Mark Zuckerberg
Keyword details
Total words: 46,063
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score15 analyzed articles46.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst