Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kat Stansell results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 2,360 hits . Analysis detected 11,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,502 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,347 authors). This Kat Stansell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kat Stansell
Author details
Total words: 5,502
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 42.9% 42.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.1% 10.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.6% 15.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.0% 0.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Author 42.9%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 13.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst