Speaker summary
49% 4 analyzed articles/videos 249.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Levine results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 111 hits . Analysis detected 629.464 faulty-reasoning hits from 249.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,885 of 28,100 speakers). This Mark Levine is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. Mark Levine
Speaker details
Total words: 249.333
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.1% percentile 14.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos249.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 41.9% 41.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 27.4% 27.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 22.9% 22.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Begging the Question: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst