Speaker summary
54% 10 analyzed articles/videos 609.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Gurman results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 244.647 hits . Analysis detected 814.938 faulty-reasoning hits from 609.667 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (25,637 of 27,797 speakers). This Mark Gurman is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Mark Gurman
Speaker details
Total words: 609.667
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 8.2% BS Score10 analyzed videos609.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 35.4% 35.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 20.5% 20.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst