Author summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Parsons results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 830 hits . Analysis detected 6,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,889 of 6,628 authors). This Jeff Parsons is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Jeff Parsons
Author details
Total words: 8,040
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.3%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst