Mashable67%

Apple could deactivate leased iPhones remotely for non-payment, report says 44%

7/23/2026, 8:28:17 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 477 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (11,955 of 21,106 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the article peer group.

The iPhone 18 is about to launch , along with the final version of its operating system, iOS 27 , most likely in September. 
But a new report says it may arrive with a feature that lets Apple, and third-party lenders, remotely deactivate phones if customers fall behind on payments. 
With the iOS 27 beta now widely available, 9to5Mac found code that would let Apple place delinquent iPhones in "Restricted Mode." 
This would limit users to a short list of widgets and apps, including the App Store, Clock, Settings, Wallet, and Passwords, according to the report. 
In theory, 9to5Mac says the system could work like this: Authorized financing partners who lease iPhones to customers get to perform regular status checks to see if the contract is still valid. 
If a customer falls behind, Restricted Mode would be activated. 
The feature is "unequivocally present" in the iOS 27 beta, according to 9to5Mac - and a future update to iOS 26 could bring this feature to older iPhones as well. 
iPhone 18 news, leaks, and rumors: Release date, iPhone 18 Pro details, more info 
The era of internet-connected "smart" devices has had plenty of benefits for consumers, but as consumer advocates have long warned, it also allows brands to remotely turn off devices . 
Why might Apple be testing a tool like this right now? 
Let's dive in. 
Credit: Timothy Werth / Mashable 
If you've bought any new tech products recently, you've probably noticed: New devices are getting really expensive . 
Just this month Apple raised prices on a variety of its products. iPhone prices haven't risen just yet, but Tim Cook has prepared the ground for an "unavoidable" iPhone price hike . 
Thanks to the ongoing global memory chip crisis known as RAMageddon, new phones now require a serious investment. 
The new foldable phones released by Samsung this week were preceded by a new Galaxy credit card program . 
Apple is believed to be readying a new leasing program of its own. 
Bloomberg's Apple oracle, Mark Gurman, says Apple will launch the "Apple Upgrade" leasing program later this month. 
Gurman calls it "one of the biggest-ever changes to how the company sells" new devices - and says Apple Upgrade will be part of a partnership with the online lender Klarna, giving buyers a lease-to-buy option. iPhone customers who qualify could make monthly payments over two years. 
The code discovered by 9to5Mac also reportedly includes another type of locking mechanism called "Partner Finance Lock," which would stop users from trying to resell a financed device. 
Clearly, Apple and Klarna can't let customers who miss payments continue to use leased iPhones indefinitely. 
But it's also an uncomfortable reminder of how much control Big Tech has over our devices. 
Mashable reached out to Apple for comment about Restricted Mode; we'll update this story if this famously taciturn tech giant provides new information. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Mashable: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Mashable: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 5.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.3%Mashable: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Mashable: 4.9%Negativity Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 4.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.9%Mashable: 3.4%Appeal to Authority11.9%This article: 3.3%Mashable: 1.4%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 2.0%Mashable: 0.5%Slippery Slope2.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 22.3%Mashable: 4.9%Hasty Generalization22.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.3%Mashable: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion3.3%This article: 2.3%Mashable: 0.8%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 7.6%Mashable: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.6%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.7%Mashable: 1.6%Anecdotal3.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.3%Mashable: 10.3%Biased Writer Voice11.3%This article: 3.3%Mashable: 2.6%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 18.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

488 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech424writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMark Gurman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMark Gurman • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mark Gurman

73%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words100% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.0 ptsWriter: 13.0%Mark Gurman: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Mark Gurman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.