Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These David Phelan results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 1,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This David Phelan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. David Phelan
Author details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst