Author summary
25% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chance Miller results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 2,278 hits . Analysis detected 14,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,449 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,549 of 6,625 authors). This Chance Miller is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Chance Miller
Author details
Total words: 22,449
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst