9to5Mac58%

MacBook Pro overhaul: entry-level model to gain new design sooner than expected 45%

By Michael Burkhardt76%

7/4/2026, 3:03:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 1,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 578 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.5% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,163 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the article peer group.

Earlier this week, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman revealed that Apple has a new M7-powered entry level MacBook Pro in the pipeline for spring 2027. 
This isn’t an ordinary MacBook Pro refresh though. 
It’ll bring the upcoming redesign down to the entry level, something that previously wasn’t expected. 
Normally, when Apple introduces a new MacBook Pro design, it takes a short while to trickle down. 
For instance, the 14-inch MacBook Pro with M1 Pro and M1 Max was introduced in 2021, but the base model MacBook Pro stuck with the 13-inch design until 2023, when it gained the 14-inch chassis with the M3 chip. 
Similarly, when Apple redesigned the MacBook Pro in 2016, it wasn’t until 2019 that the entry level model gained the Touch Bar. 
There’s also a similar story for the 2012 retina MacBook Pro redesign. 
This time around though, there’ll only be a roughly 6 month gap before the redesign comes to the entry level. 
M7 entry-level with redesign 
According to Bloomberg, Apple will be introducing the redesign to the entry level MacBook Pro in early 2027, shortly after debuting it in the high end MacBook Pros, rumored to be called MacBook Ultra. 
From the report: 
Apple is also preparing a revamped entry-level MacBook Pro, code-named K104, for as early as the first half of next year. 
The 14-inch laptop will adopt a new design in line with what Apple is preparing for higher-end MacBooks with touch screens due between the end of this year and early next year. 
It’s worth noting that there’ll also be another entry level MacBook Pro with the current design and the M6 chip, which is currently on track to debut this fall alongside the redesigned high-end MacBook Pros. 
To make things even weirder, those redesigned high-end MacBook Pros are also expected to debut with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, instead of M6 generation chips. 
Apple recently made a decision to abandon its plans for high end M6 chips to instead accelerate M7. 
In short, it’ll look like this: 
* Fall 2026: Entry-level MacBook Pro with M6/old design, high-end with M5 Pro/Max and new design 
* Spring 2027: Entry-level MacBook Pro with M7 and new design 
* Fall 2027: High-end MacBook Pro refresh with M7 Pro/M7 Max 
Of course, the redesign is expected to feature a slightly thinner chassis, OLED displays with touch support, and possibly even come with a Dynamic Island. 
Wrap up 
With the recent price hikes, this is excellent news for some people. 
I’m sure the redesigned 14-inch MacBook Pro with M5 Pro will likely cost over $2500, so if you’re looking to get something more in budget with the M7 chip and the redesign, you’ll only have to wait until the following spring. 
It’s certainly unfortunate that the $1,999 price point of the entry level MacBook Pro today is what the Pro chip versions cost just under a year ago, but that’s the inevitable reality of this memory shortage. 
Are you looking forward to the M7 MacBook Pro with the redesign? 
Let us know in the comments. 
My favorite Apple accessory recommendations: 
* Anker MagSafe/Qi2 Ultra-Slim Battery Pack 
* AirPods Pro 3 (2x ANC vs AirPods Pro 2!) 
* Anker Nano 45W Fast Charger with Smart Display 
* Anker Nano 13-in-1 MacBook Docking Station 
* Logitech MX Master 4 Mouse for Mac 
* Belkin Qi2 3-in-1 MagSafe Charging Stand 
Follow Michael: X/Twitter, Bluesky, Instagram 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.6%Michael Burkhardt: 2.8%9to5Mac: 2.7%Confirmation Bias2.6%This article: 6.6%Michael Burkhardt: 2.3%9to5Mac: 2.2%Anchoring Bias6.6%This article: 12.6%Michael Burkhardt: 2.5%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic12.6%This article: 19.0%Michael Burkhardt: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic19.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 19.6%Michael Burkhardt: 4.3%9to5Mac: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias19.6%This article: 7.4%Michael Burkhardt: 6.1%9to5Mac: 5.3%Framing Effect7.4%This article: 7.1%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.3%Loss Aversion7.1%This article: 12.3%Michael Burkhardt: 1.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 18.7%Michael Burkhardt: 6.3%9to5Mac: 3.4%Optimism Bias18.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 1.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Michael Burkhardt: 6.0%9to5Mac: 4.6%Negativity Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 1.0%9to5Mac: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Michael Burkhardt: 5.2%9to5Mac: 3.5%Halo Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Michael Burkhardt: 1.7%9to5Mac: 1.8%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.9%Michael Burkhardt: 4.1%9to5Mac: 3.6%Appeal to Authority9.9%This article: 7.1%Michael Burkhardt: 3.5%9to5Mac: 1.4%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.0%Michael Burkhardt: 6.5%9to5Mac: 4.8%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.1%Michael Burkhardt: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.8%Bandwagon7.1%This article: 4.2%Michael Burkhardt: 1.8%9to5Mac: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion4.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.3%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.6%Michael Burkhardt: 3.0%9to5Mac: 2.4%Anecdotal10.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.7%Michael Burkhardt: 3.2%9to5Mac: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground4.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.9%Michael Burkhardt: 1.3%9to5Mac: 2.4%Unattributed Quote9.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.4%Michael Burkhardt: 11.0%9to5Mac: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice1.4%This article: 7.1%Michael Burkhardt: 2.4%9to5Mac: 2.1%Indoctrination7.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 18.0%Michael Burkhardt: 22.9%9to5Mac: 15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…18.0%

578 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers9.9%attributed speech521writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMark Gurman • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBloomberg • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bloomberg

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words60% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bloomberg: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -20.0 ptsWriter: 20.0%Bloomberg: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Bloomberg: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Bloomberg: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.