9to5Mac58%

M7 Ultra to potentially feature up to 1.5TB of RAM 68%

By Michael Burkhardt76%

7/12/2026, 7:34:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 571 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.2% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,138 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

M7 Ultra to potentially feature up to 1.5TB of RAM, finally matching 2019 Mac Pro: report 
Michael Burkhardt | Jul 12 2026 - 7:34 am PT 
According to the latest Power On newsletter from Mark Gurman, Apple is preparing to include up to 1.5TB of RAM in the upcoming M7 Ultra chip. 
This’ll mean Apple Silicon will finally match the highest RAM configuration available on the highest end 2019 Intel Mac Pro. 
The amount of RAM available in Apple Silicon Macs has always been a limitation, largely because Apple solders the RAM onto the same die as the processor  allowing for immensely high transfer speeds. 
This is what makes unified memory possible. 
Of course, it also means the amount of RAM is limited to how big the chipset is. 
However, according to Mark Gurman , it sounds like Apple is finally preparing to close that gap. 
The company is preparing a configuration of the M7 Ultra chipset with 1.5TB of RAM: 
The new Ultra is designed to support as much as 1.5 terabytes of memory  roughly double the capacity planned for the M5 Ultra  though whether Apple ultimately offers that configuration will depend on the state of the industry. 
Widespread memory-chip shortages have made the component harder to find and more expensive. 
He does note that it might not end up launching with 1.5TB of RAM because of the ongoing memory shortage. 
Nonetheless, Apple is engineering the M7 Ultra to support it. 
Earlier this year, Apple discontinued the 512GB configuration of the M3 Ultra Mac Studio. 
It then followed by discontinuing the 256GB configuration  leaving 96GB as the sole choice for the highest end Mac Studio. 
If you bought M4 Max instead, you could configure up to 128GB. 
Apple will also be debuting a new M5 Ultra chip later this year with up to 768GB of unified memory, a new record for Apple silicon. 
Based on Apple’s current RAM pricing (roughly $25 per additional gigabyte), upgrading to 1.5TB of RAM from a base configuration of 128GB will likely cost over $35,000. 
My favorite Apple accessory recommendations: 
Anker MagSafe/Qi2 Ultra-Slim Battery Pack 
AirPods Pro 3 (2x ANC vs AirPods Pro 2!) 
Anker Nano 45W Fast Charger with Smart Display 
Anker Nano 13-in-1 MacBook Docking Station 
Logitech MX Master 4 Mouse for Mac 
Belkin Qi2 3-in-1 MagSafe Charging Stand 
Follow Michael: X/Twitter , Bluesky , Instagram 
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news: 
Michael is 9to5Mac’s Weekend Editor, keeping up with all of the latest Apple news on Saturday and Sunday. 
He got started in the world of Apple news during the pandemic, and it became a growing hobby. 
He’s also an indie iOS developer in his free time, and has published numerous apps over the years. 
Michael Burkhardt's favorite gear 
Anker 25K Compact Battery Bank 
Featuring two built in cables, a built in display, multiple ports, a 25,000mAh capacity, and up to 100W of output - this is one of the best battery banks for recharging your entire Apple ecosystem on the go. 
AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) 
Despite a new version reportedly being around a corner, I still personally believe AirPods Pro 2 are a great deal. 
They're already equipped with USB-C, and continually gain new software features. 
With them consistently going on sale, it's a great purchase to make. 
Features like Adaptive Audio are incredible. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.9%Michael Burkhardt: 2.8%9to5Mac: 2.7%Confirmation Bias8.9%This article: 11.7%Michael Burkhardt: 2.3%9to5Mac: 2.2%Anchoring Bias11.7%This article: 4.4%Michael Burkhardt: 2.5%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic4.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Michael Burkhardt: 4.3%9to5Mac: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias9.6%This article: 7.9%Michael Burkhardt: 6.1%9to5Mac: 5.3%Framing Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.6%Michael Burkhardt: 1.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.8%Michael Burkhardt: 6.3%9to5Mac: 3.4%Optimism Bias12.8%This article: 10.5%Michael Burkhardt: 1.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias10.5%This article: 9.6%Michael Burkhardt: 6.0%9to5Mac: 4.6%Negativity Bias9.6%This article: 4.7%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias4.7%This article: 6.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 1.0%9to5Mac: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Michael Burkhardt: 5.2%9to5Mac: 3.5%Halo Effect14.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Michael Burkhardt: 1.7%9to5Mac: 1.8%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 3.2%Michael Burkhardt: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.8%Michael Burkhardt: 4.1%9to5Mac: 3.6%Appeal to Authority13.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 3.5%9to5Mac: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Michael Burkhardt: 6.5%9to5Mac: 4.8%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.4%Michael Burkhardt: 1.8%9to5Mac: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion11.4%This article: 1.2%Michael Burkhardt: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.6%Begging the Question1.2%This article: 10.2%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.7%Michael Burkhardt: 3.0%9to5Mac: 2.4%Anecdotal6.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%Michael Burkhardt: 3.2%9to5Mac: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 1.3%9to5Mac: 2.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 11.0%9to5Mac: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.8%Michael Burkhardt: 2.4%9to5Mac: 2.1%Indoctrination2.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 28.4%Michael Burkhardt: 22.9%9to5Mac: 15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…28.4%

571 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers10.0%attributed speech514writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burkhardt • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMark Gurman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMark Gurman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burkhardt • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mark Gurman

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words75% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -30.7 ptsWriter: 30.7%Mark Gurman: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Mark Gurman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.