Speaker summary
47% 43 analyzed articles/videos 1,651.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Carney results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 3,251.007 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,651.333 analyzed words across 43 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,572 of 26,841 speakers). This Mark Carney is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Mark Carney
Speaker details
Total words: 1,651.333
Content count: 43
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score43 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Tu Quoque: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst