Speaker summary
42% 77 analyzed articles/videos 2,099.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Department results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 303.736 hits . Analysis detected 3,003.504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,099.667 analyzed words across 77 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,079 of 28,364 speakers). This Justice Department is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Justice Department
Speaker details
Total words: 2,099.667
Article count: 77
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score77 analyzed videos2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst