Newsday55%

Biden drops lawsuit seeking to block release of recordings of his interviews with a ghostwriter 10%

By The Associated Press63%

7/24/2026, 11:03:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 528 faulty-reasoning hits from 387 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,849 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  Joe Biden on Friday dropped a lawsuit in which he sought block the release of audio recordings and transcripts of his interviews with a memoir ghostwriter before the Delaware Democrat was elected president, paving the way for the material to be released to a Republican-led congressional committee. 
Biden's attorneys filed the notice of voluntary dismissal less than a week after a divided panel of appeals court judges rejected his bid to block the material's release. 
Biden could have petitioned the Supreme Court to intervene or asked for a rehearing by the full U.S. 
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 
In a 2-1 ruling on Monday, a three-judge panel from the circuit court found a “substantial” public interest in disclosing the material that Biden wants to keep under wraps. 
The panel had suspended its decision until Aug. 3 to allow more time for Biden to consider his appellate options. 
Circuit Judge Florence Pan wrote a dissenting opinion in which she said Biden has shown a “substantial privacy interest” in keeping the material hidden. 
The appeal also was heard by D.C. 
Circuit Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan and Judge Gregory Katsas. 
Pan was nominated to the court by Biden, a Democrat. 
Srinivasan was nominated by President Barack Obama, also a Democrat. 
Katsas was nominated by President Donald Trump, a Republican. 
Mark Zwonitzer, who worked with Biden on two memoirs, 2007’s “Promises to Keep” and 2017’s “Promise Me, Dad,” interviewed him at his home in 2016 and 2017. 
Biden’s lawyers say the conversations were candid, personal and intended to remain private. 
The recordings were obtained by special counsel Robert Hur, who investigated Biden’s handling of classified documents from his time as a senator from Delaware and as Obama’s vice president. 
Republicans in Congress demanded the material after Hur declined to file charges against the then-president. 
Biden sued and sought an injunction to prevent the Justice Department under Trump from releasing the recordings to Congress and the conservative Heritage Foundation. 
The department previously argued that the recordings were exempt from disclosure under public records law. 
Biden appealed after U.S. 
District Judge Dabney Friedrich, a Trump nominee, ruled in June that the public interest in the material outweighed whatever privacy rights Biden had. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.5%The Associated Press: 2.8%Newsday: 2.4%Confirmation Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%Newsday: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.2%Newsday: 3.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.5%The Associated Press: 0.9%Newsday: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Newsday: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Newsday: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.7%The Associated Press: 11.1%Newsday: 5.9%Framing Effect22.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Newsday: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Newsday: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%Newsday: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%Newsday: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.9%The Associated Press: 11.0%Newsday: 11.8%Negativity Bias19.9%This article: 3.4%The Associated Press: 2.2%Newsday: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Newsday: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%The Associated Press: 2.2%Newsday: 0.9%In-Group Bias17.6%This article: 4.9%The Associated Press: 1.0%Newsday: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%Newsday: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%The Associated Press: 2.0%Newsday: 2.1%Recency Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Newsday: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Newsday: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%The Associated Press: 3.8%Newsday: 4.2%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Newsday: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Newsday: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.0%Newsday: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Newsday: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Newsday: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 5.6%Newsday: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Newsday: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.9%The Associated Press: 2.8%Newsday: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Newsday: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.4%The Associated Press: 1.3%Newsday: 2.0%Anecdotal3.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 1.7%Newsday: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%The Associated Press: 1.8%Newsday: 2.3%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Newsday: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.5%The Associated Press: 3.9%Newsday: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice16.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Newsday: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Newsday: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Newsday: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Newsday: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

387 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.2%attributed speech363writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Florence Pan

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words100% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Florence Pan: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.6 ptsWriter: 17.6%Florence Pan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.