Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Congressional Investigations results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 783 hits. Analysis detected 6,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,844 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,435 topics). This Congressional Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 6,844
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos