Author summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 1,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annie Waldman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 676 hits . Analysis detected 4,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,670 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,553 of 6,563 authors). This Annie Waldman is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Annie Waldman
Author details
Total words: 5,670
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst