Speaker summary
71% 11 analyzed articles/videos 725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Ossoff results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 262 hits . Analysis detected 1,942.693 faulty-reasoning hits from 725 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,686 of 28,364 speakers). This Jon Ossoff is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Jon Ossoff
Speaker details
Total words: 725
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 7.2% BS Score11 analyzed videos725 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 28.6% 28.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Horn Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst