Author summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Kerr results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 2,256 hits . Analysis detected 14,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,367 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,475 of 6,316 authors). This Andrew Kerr is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Andrew Kerr
Author details
Total words: 11,367
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Tu Quoque: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst