Speaker summary
32% 47 analyzed articles/videos 2,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Roberts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Emotion , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,132 hits . Analysis detected 3,583.085 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,229 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,179 of 28,364 speakers). This John Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. John Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 2,229
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score47 analyzed videos2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 25.0% 25.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst