Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Memo results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ad Hominem , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 947 hits . Analysis detected 6,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (196 of 398 publications). This National Memo is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst