Author summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Charen results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 2,505 hits . Analysis detected 15,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,372 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,714 of 6,628 authors). This Mona Charen is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Mona Charen
Author details
Total words: 16,372
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.3% 15.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst