Author summary
32% 1 analyzed article/video 707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JEFF McMURRAY results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 344 hits . Analysis detected 1,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,462 of 6,508 authors). This JEFF McMURRAY is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. JEFF McMURRAY
Author details
Total words: 2,828
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst